I’ve been pondering the various books that I can really say have changed me. Typically these are works that either exposed me to something I hadn’t known before, but identified with on a level which I can only describe as genetic, or challenged me in some fashion.
Here’s mycurrent list, in the order that I recall reading them.
Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy – Showed me the value of taking nothing seriously.
The Great Gatsby – No other book, that I’ve read anyway, has demonstrated the power, and folly, of self delusion and obsession.
I, Robot – Sure, I should have read Frankenstein first, but I didn’t. Still, the idea of a functional, complete being that is treated as monstrous is something I imagine any teenager can relate to. For that matter it’s an idea that’s powerful to me even now, when I examine my inner landscape.
Dune – These books challenged me to think about what it means, what it should mean, to be human, the power and damage of blind(ing) faith, behavioral cycles, and really described a way of looking at the mind as a toolbox. It also laid the foundations for me to understand the Middle Eastern power struggles he drew upon, such as OPEC and the concept of hydraulic despotism, all tied to a culture of zealotry.
The Stars My Destination – A classic of Sci-Fi, illustrating a man’s progress from greedy, selfish animal to a citizen within a social contract. At the end of it all, he rises from his selfish crimes to commit a potentially world destroying crime, one that requires the power brokers of the solar system to own up to what they’ve done, changing soceity into something more honest. The most important thing is that, having done this, he knows it was still a crime, and the he must pay penance, even if the crime yielded something good. I’d say this really exposed me to the idea of moral complexity, as well as generating some feeling of what social contracts are about.
A Book of Five Rings – Distinguishing between strength, cunning, actual strategy, and how often these things are confused with each other, especially by the successful. Another powerful idea is that everything is of the world, so knowing one thing teaches you principles that apply to all things.
Catcher in the Rye – The ending of the book is like slamming your head in a door. It might be just trauma, or there might be meaning, but I can’t really tell and often find myself flipping around what it all meant. This confusion, and uncertainty, is by itself useful. Nothing is worse than absolute certainty.
Armor – I’m pretty sure it’s at least influenced by Batman and Superman, but I certainly won’t hold that against it. It takes a character that is, essentially, monstrous, but only because he is so very human. It describes a form of frustration that is difficult to define in less than a novel, while also demonstrating the cleansing effect of having your ego smashed against someone who is, quite simply, better than you. Not because you can’t be as good, but because what you thought was depth of will was actually a wading pool, and that you merely lacked perspective. The monstrousness comes about because the character, our protagonist, is essentially a tool of vengeance, not a traditional hero. He is constantly running, because the will to live is encoded beyond his control, while another character, truly a classic hero, dies fruitlessly, but not meaninglessly. It’s very complex, and brings up so many little challenges to the self, with a handful of big questions stitched into its very fabric, that I couldn’t help but feel different after reading it.
Blindsight – Talk about challenging. This book peeled back layers inside a version of me that I already thought pretty sparse. I related all too readily for comfort to the semi-sociopathic narrator, and found myself shattering alongside him. Question what being me really is, not just the useless idea of why but really what it all is. I felt lessened after reading it, but all the stronger for having the excess shaved away.